<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="rdf.xsl"?>
<rdf:RDF  xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
				  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
					xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
					
<channel rdf:about="http://livepress.com">
          <title>Labor Law - livepress.com</title>
      <link>http://Labor Law.livepress.com</link>
      <description>Updated every 15 minutes of every day - FOR PERSONAL USE ONLY</description>
  <dc:publisher>livepress.com</dc:publisher>
  <dc:creator>livepress.com</dc:creator>
  <dc:rights>Copyright &#169; 2006 livepress.com</dc:rights>
  <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
  <sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
  <items>
    <rdf:Seq>
      <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://livepress.com" />
    </rdf:Seq>
  </items>
</channel>
<item rdf:about="http://livepress.com/go/?10021">
  		<title><![CDATA[Trial Court Dismisses New York Labor Law Suit in 20-Foot Fall From Ladder Resulting in Brain Injury]]></title>
	  	<link>http://livepress.com/go/?10021</link>
  		  		<dc:description><![CDATA[In a recent case involving millions in potential damages, an employee sued his employer alleging that he was entitled to protection under New York';s  Labor Law . The employee had fallen off a 20-foot ladder, and suffered severe injuries, including brain damage. TELS attorneys represented the employer and, on motion for summary judgment, were able to demonstrate to the Supreme Court of the State of New York (County of Nassau) that the employee was involved in routine maintenance. Because he was not making substantial changes to the building, he was not entitled to extraordinary protections under New York';s  Labor Law . The Court agreed, and dismissed the entire case with prejudice. While open to interpretation, this case and others like it may demonstrate a trend towards a narrowing, more restrictive view of the  Labor Law . [PRWEB Dec 27, 2005]]]></dc:description>
  				</item>
</rdf:RDF>